Re: [HACKERS] regression tests

> >     I took Peter Eisentraut's advice and did it with the old pslq
> >     (thanks for the hint).
> > 
> >     This problem (as expected) remains and happens  in  the  temp
> >     test.   The  two notices occur on creating the temp table and
> >     the index on it.  After that, the database  connection  get's
> >     lost on the attempt to drop the temp table.
> > 
> >     Since the postmaster is doing recovery then, the numeric test
> >     hasn't been run. All other tests are still O.K.
> > 
> >     The question is, who did  something  that  could  cause  this
> >     error?
> 
> I am sure it was me changing the temp behavior.  I will look at it.

Jan, I can't reproduce the temp regression failure here.  I did make
changes yesterday morning to this.  I assume you have an updated cvs,
right?

Anyway to make the default numeric regression test run faster.  It seems
to take quite a while compared to the others.

We certainly need someone to update the regression tests to match the
new format so people can continue running regression tests before
applying patches.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026