Re: [HACKERS] regression tests

>     I took Peter Eisentraut's advice and did it with the old pslq
>     (thanks for the hint).
> 
>     This problem (as expected) remains and happens  in  the  temp
>     test.   The  two notices occur on creating the temp table and
>     the index on it.  After that, the database  connection  get's
>     lost on the attempt to drop the temp table.
> 
>     Since the postmaster is doing recovery then, the numeric test
>     hasn't been run. All other tests are still O.K.
> 
>     The question is, who did  something  that  could  cause  this
>     error?

I am sure it was me changing the temp behavior.  I will look at it.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026