Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199910201741.NAA12484@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits (Brook Milligan <brook@biology.nmsu.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> AFAICT, the last remaining textual length limits in the backend are a > couple of fixed-size buffers in rewriteDefine.c and array support. > In the next few days (probably this weekend) I intend to fix that code > and then remove all #define constants that have anything to do with > string length limits. (Tentative hit list is attached.) > > Great! > > Jan, does this mean that we can also lose the "rewrite string too big" > problem with rules? > > That would be a huge win. No. We have to have long tuples. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: