Re: [HACKERS] Planner drops unreferenced tables --- bug, no?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Planner drops unreferenced tables --- bug, no? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199910050404.AAA28614@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Planner drops unreferenced tables --- bug, no? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Actually, it would probably be cleanest if we split the functions of > inFromCl into two separate flags, say "inFromCl" and "inJoinSet". > The point of inFromCl is that when we add an implicit RTE using the > Postquel extension, it shouldn't suddenly become part of the available > namespace for unqualified column names processed later in the query. > So inFromCl controls the use of the RTE to look up unqualified names. > However, if we believe that the planner should subsequently treat that > implicit RTE as if it were a normal join target, then we need a separate > flag that carries that information. Two different flags seems like the perfect way. Let me know if you need any help adding the flag. I would be glad to do it. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: