Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs Mysql for website?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs Mysql for website? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199910020233.WAA10622@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL vs Mysql for website? (Scott Perkins <2scott@bellsouth.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> In a discussion with a local Linux enthusiast we were discussing which > would be better for a small website project to be driven by PHP and hosted by > nix/nuz and apache. I have seen that Mysql does not support unions, > transactions, subselects. PostgreSQL supports subselects and transactions. I > don't know about unions. In any case > performance is not an issue because of size of project so primary considerations > would be: > > 1. learning curve/ease of use/functions supported > 1b. quality of documentation > 2. reliability > 3. availability of prewritten apps for reuse > 4. others overlooked? > Please see the FAQ item on the web site discussing comparisons between PostgreSQL and other dbms's. I can answer any questions you have. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: