Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199909201323.JAA18526@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? (Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote: > > > > Where do we attach to shmem after fork() ? > > I couldn't find the place. > > Ops, sorry, you're right - postinit.c:InitCommunication(): > > if (!IsUnderPostmaster) /* postmaster already did this */ > { > PostgresIpcKey = key; > AttachSharedMemoryAndSemaphores(key); > } > > Though, AttachSharedMemoryAndSemaphores(): > > if (key == PrivateIPCKey) > { > CreateSharedMemoryAndSemaphores(key, 16); > return; > } > > ... and useless shmem attachment stuff follows after this ... > > Cleanup is still required, but subj is closed, thanks -:) My guess is that this is something I missed when removing the exec(). -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: