Re: [HACKERS] 6.6

> I would like to see something from Jan too...
> My opinion is that RI _MUST_ be implemented in 6.6.
> There are 3 ways:
> 
> 1. Using deferrable rules/statement level triggers.
> 2. Using transaction log (to read changes made in
>    parent/child tables and check RI constraints).
> 3. Using DIRTY READ in refint.c
> 
> I hope to be able to do 2. or 3., though it would be much 
> better to have 1. (with statement level triggers) implemented by Jan.

Uh, oh.   Vadim has thrown down the hachet on a 6.6 _must_ _have_ item.

(I agree with him, but am glad I didn't have to do it.)

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026