Re: PostgreSQL order of evaluation
От | marten@feki.toppoint.de |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL order of evaluation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199908221623.JAA09740@feki.toppoint.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL order of evaluation (Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Re: PostgreSQL order of evaluation
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> > Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 01:25:54 +0200 > From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> > Subject: PostgreSQL order of evaluation > > I've been trying to find where the order of evaluation for SQL is > defined. In short, I wounder if the following always gives the same > result: > > CREATE SEQUENCE counter > start 1 increment 1 cache 1 > minvalue 1 > maxvalue 2147483647; > SELECT NEXTVAL('counter'), NEXTVAL('counter'); > > CREATE TABLE counts ( > value1 integer, > value2 integer > ); > INSERT INTO counts VALUES (NEXTVAL('counter'), NEXTVAL('counter')); > > Will the first always return (1, 2) or are the SQL implementations > free to return (2,1). Will every SQL implementation insert (3,4) in > the table, or will some insert (4,3). > Why are you so sure, that you may get numbers with differences of one ? As I understand the backend caches several numbers in advance and when running several backends you may also get numbers like (1,10). After all: the only thing you can be sure: both numbers are unique ! Marten
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: