Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages
От | Oliver Elphick |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199908101504.QAA26145@linda.lfix.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: >As long as we install into /usr/local/pgsql/man/man*, naming conflicts >with other packages aren't too biga deal --- there's no physical file >conflict, and people can just add or remove /usr/local/pgsql/man/ in >their MANPATHsettings to see or not see Postgres manpages. But do remember us poor distribution maintainers. It makes life a lot easier for us if upstream writers make an effort not to conflict with the rest of the world! If some local user or administrator puts PostgreSQL on his machine, it may be appropriate to use /usr/local, but a PostgreSQL package installed as part of a distribution should never use it. -- Vote against SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ ======================================== Oliver Elphick Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver PGP key from public servers; key ID32B8FAA1 ======================================== "If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you." John 15:7
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: