Re: [HACKERS] RE: [INTERFACES] Re: SSL patch

> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> But, we've had protocol changes before that breaks backward
> >> compatibility...why is this all of a sudden a problem?
> 
> > No reason to change the protocol when we don't need to.

What I meant is that there is reason to break compatibility when we
don't need to.  Magnus seems like he has addressed this already.

> 
> The point is that we *do not have to* break backwards compatibility to
> add this feature, and indeed hardly anything would be gained by breaking
> compatibility.  See subsequent messages from myself and Magnus.
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026