Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199907201715.NAA29491@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > >> Maybe it is time to swallow hard and redesign the querytree > >> representation? > > > Well, while you do that keep in mind outer joins. > > While *I* redesign it? I barely know what an outer join is. > > I'm happy to kibitz while someone else redesigns it, but I don't > think I'm qualified to be the lead dog... Did you want to do the change for UNION, or were you just suggesting it be done? I can easily add it to the TODO list. Done: * redesign UNION structures to have separarate target lists. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: