Re: [HACKERS] "24" < INT_MIN returns TRUE ???
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] "24" < INT_MIN returns TRUE ??? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199907091707.NAA02248@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] "24" < INT_MIN returns TRUE ??? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] "24" < INT_MIN returns TRUE ???
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I said: > > Do you have <limits.h>, and if so how does it define INT_MIN? > > Actually, looking closer, it doesn't matter whether you have <limits.h>, > because there is yet a *third* bug in numutils.c: > > #ifdef HAVE_LIMITS > #include <limits.h> > #endif > > should be > > #ifdef HAVE_LIMITS_H > ... > > because that is how configure and config.h spell the configuration > symbol. Thus, <limits.h> is never included on *any* platform, > and our broken default INT_MIN is always used. Yes, I caught this when you made that comment about the LIMIT test. I am checking all the other HAVE_ tests. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: