Re: [HACKERS] PATCH for pgconnection.h

> On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > I think the proper solution is to add a configure-time test to see
> > whether a namespace declaration is needed.  We could use configure to
> > see whether we need ".h" on the end of C++ include file references, too.
> > (That's another thing that's going to be site-dependent for a while to
> > come.)
> 
> Hmmm.  I'm running 2.7.2.1 here and in the case of <string> I have a
> file called: /usr/include/g++/string <-- note there's no .h on the end.
> Am I being dense here and missing something or does this differ from what
> other folks have?  There's also a number of other files without the .h
> extension in that directory.  string includes std/string.h.
> 

We remove .h, and someone complains, we add .h, and someone complains,
but fewer people.  Configure is the answer.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026