Re: [HACKERS] Tuple length limit
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Tuple length limit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199907041420.KAA07003@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Tuple length limit (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > >> Can someone tell me what the maximum tuple length is? > > I had always thought that the limit was supposed to be BLCKSZ less > overhead. > > > Here is what I found with the new code. Seems it works. > > test=> vacuum; > > VACUUM > > Wasn't the complaint that started this thread something about "peculiar > behavior" of VACUUM with big tuples? Might be wise to check VACUUM more > closely. We were inconsistent. Varchar and vacuum where BLCKSZ/2, while others where BLCKSZ, of course minus overhead. The new code is consistent, and does proper padding. I even got rid of a fudge factor in rewrite storage by using the actual rewrite lengths. Will be in 6.5.1. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: