Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status

> > I think we did pretty well.
> 
> First time for last two years -:)).

Yes, Tom, this is not typical for post-release.  Your helping
certainly contributed to this quietness.

> 
> > > What do people want to do now?  Does anyone want to start on 6.6?  Do we
> > > want to release 6.5.1?  Should we relax for a few more weeks and bask in
> > > the stable release?
> > 
> > IMHO we do need to make a 6.5.1 release --- I know I have a couple of
> > stupid bugs in 6.5 :-(.  But it is not urgent; we could wait another
> > couple of weeks and see if anything else pops up.
> > 
> > Probably the nearer decision is when to split the tree for 6.6.
> > Is anyone ready to start on new stuff for 6.6?  The argument that
> > we wanted to avoid double-patching is looking less compelling with
> > so few patches, so I'm ready to see a tree split as soon as anyone
> > has anything to commit into 6.6 only...
> 
> I have nothing yet. But I just made changes to avoid
> disk writes for read-only transactions (now speed of
> selects is the same as with -F) - should I put it
> in 6.5.1 or wait for 6.6?

If you are happy with it, would be nice for 6.5.1.  Should speed things
up very much.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026