Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199906171659.MAA28299@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
RE: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > I haven't been paying much attention, but I imagine that what's really > > going on here is that once vacuum has collected all the still-good > > tuples at the front of the relation, it doesn't bother to go through > > the remaining blocks of the relation and mark everything dead therein? > > It just truncates the file after the last block that it put tuples into, > > right? > > > > If this procedure works correctly for vacuuming a simple one-segment > > table, then it would seem that truncation of all the later segments to > > zero length should work correctly. > > Not sure about that. When we truncate single segment file, the table is > being destroyed, so we invalidate it in the catalog cache and tell other > backends. Also, we have a problem with DROP TABLE in a transaction > while others are using it as described by a bug report a few days ago, > so I don't think we have that 100% either. > > That is interesting. I never thought of that. Hiroshi, can you test > that idea? If it is the non-existance of the file that other backends > are checking for, my earlier idea of rename() with truncated file kept > in place may be better. > > Also, I see why we are not getting more bug reports. They only get this > when the table looses a segment, so it is OK to vacuum large tables as > long as the table doesn't loose a segment during the vacuum. OK, this is 100% wrong. We truncate from vacuum any time the table size changes, and vacuum of large tables will fail even if not removing a segment. I forgot vacuum does this to reduce disk table size. I wonder if truncating a file to reduce its size will cause other table readers to have problems. I though vacuum had an exlusive lock on the table during vacuum, and if so, why are other backends having troubles? -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: