Re: [HACKERS] regress.sh

Thomas Lockhart wrote: >> the only remaining query being: >> *** expected/random.out Sun Aug 30 19:50:58 1998 >> ---
results/random.out Mon Jun 14 15:18:04 1999 >> *************** >> *** 19,23 **** >>     WHERE random NOT BETWEEN 80 AND
120;>>   random >>   ------ >> ! (0 rows) >>  >> --- 19,24 ---- >>     WHERE random NOT BETWEEN 80 AND 120; >>   random
>>  ------ >> !    124 >> ! (1 row) > >Well, sometimes random is too random. I'll bet if you run again you >will see a
differentresult; I'd hope that *usually* you will see the >hoped-for result. I didn't want to make the criteria too
looseso that >we would miss real problems. But sometimes the test fails, even on my >machine.
 
Every time I have run it I have had a 124 row. That's about 8 times.
(glibc2/linux/i386)

--      Vote against SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/                ========================================
Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight                              http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver              PGP key from public servers; key
ID32B8FAA1                ========================================    "I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the
merciesof      God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice,      holy, acceptable unto God, which is your
reasonable     service."       Romans 12:1