Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.5 beta2 and beta3 problem

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tatsuo Ishii
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.5 beta2 and beta3 problem
Дата
Msg-id 199906141407.XAA00874@ext16.sra.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.5 beta2 and beta3 problem  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> OK, SQL92 defines two kinds of native character sets: those we already
> have (char, varchar) and those which can be locale customized (nchar,
> national character varying, and others). char and varchar always
> default to the "SQL" behavior (which I think corresponds to ascii
> (called "SQL_TEXT") but I didn't bother looking for the details).

This seems to be a little bit different from the standard. First,
SQL_TEXT is not equal to ascii. It's a subset of ascii. Second, the
default charset for char and varchar might be implemenation dependent,
not neccesarily limited to SQL_TEXT. The only requirement is the
charset must contain the repertoire SQL_TEXT has. I think any charsets
including ascii I've ever seen satisfies the requirement. Third, the
standards says nothing about locale.
---
Tatsuo Ishii


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Tim Perdue"
Дата:
Сообщение: Backend Cache Invalidation
Следующее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.5 beta2 and beta3 problem