Re: [PORTS] Anyone working on linux Alpha?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PORTS] Anyone working on linux Alpha? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199906081735.NAA27067@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Anyone working on linux Alpha? ("Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PORTS] Anyone working on linux Alpha?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
diff -ruN pgsql/src/template/linux_alpha postgresql-patched/src/template/linux_alpha > --- pgsql/src/template/linux_alpha Tue Jun 16 06:04:00 1998 > +++ postgresql-patched/src/template/linux_alpha Tue Jun 8 17:21:32 1999 > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > AROPT:crs > -CFLAGS:-O2 -mieee > +CFLAGS:-mieee > SHARED_LIB:-fpic > ALL: > SRCH_INC: > > ====================================================================== > > This is required because of problems with egcs: > > >> Is this patch suitable for forwarding upstream? Do all linux Alphas > >> have to disable -O2? > > > > Yes. At least all that use egcs as a primary compiler (gcc 2.7.x never > > worked for us, so unless they're using gcc 2.8.x, it won't work with -O2). > > ...and... > > > The patch I mailed you DEFINITELY needs to be included upstream if > > possible. All Alphas running linux and using egcs REQUIRE it to be > > compiled without optimisation since it hoses the spinlock code (I'm > > looking into it with the guy that wrote the spinlock code for Alphas). > > And the alphapca56,7 machines are fairly common now. Mention to them that > > it might be helpful to use a config.sub from a more recent autoconf or > > libtool since it includes another two or three new Alpha types (at least > > the Debian sources do...I make sure of that :-) I have just removed optimization on linux/alpha for this reason. Can I use -O optimization on this platform instead of -O2? -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: