Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199906071320.JAA03628@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > What is it on the backend that causes some backend to think there is > > another segment. Does it just go off the end of the max segment size > > and try to open another, or do we store the number of segments > > somewhere. I thought it was the former in sgml() area. I honestly don't > > care if the segment files stay around if that is going to be a reliable > > solution. > > Other then the inode being used, what is wrong with a zero-length segment > file? Nothing is wrong with it. I just thought it would be more reliable to unlink it, but now am considering I was wrong. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: