Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
Дата
Msg-id 199906070044.UAA17625@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6  (Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Oh, I see.  SELECT is a transaction, so it flushes pglog.  Re-added to
TODO.

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > > In short, if you load a bunch of tuples into a table, the first select
> > > after the load can run a lot slower than you might expect, because it'll
> > > be writing back most or all of the pages it touches.  But that penalty
> > > doesn't affect every select, only the first one to scan a newly-written
> > > tuple.
> > 
> > I have removed this from the TODO list:
> > 
> >         * Prevent fsync in SELECT-only queries
> 
> When selecting (i.e. - read-only) transaction commits,
> it change pg_log - we obviously can avoid this!
> No sense to store commit/abort status of read-only xactions!
> 
> Vadim
> 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Mark Hollomon"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6