Re: [HACKERS] nonblocking lock?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] nonblocking lock? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199906021533.LAA22273@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] nonblocking lock? (Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > Is it possible to do a nonblocking lock? That is, > > I want several clients to execute, > > > > begin > > if table A is locked > > then > > go around doing stuff on other tables > > else > > lock A and do stuff on A > > endif > > > > the problem is, if I use normal lock, then > > after one client has locked and is doing stuff on A > > the other one will block and thus it won't be able > > to go around doing stuff on other tables. Is it > > possible to do a nonblocking lock that will just > > fail if the table is locked already? > > Try with user locks. You can find the code in contrib/userlocks. Yes, this is the proper PostgreSQL solution. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: