please?
От | Pablo Funes |
---|---|
Тема | please? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199905311708.NAA32523@mancha.cs.brandeis.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] please?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Please take a sec to read this question. I've posted it several times but got no comments at all. Thanx, Pablo. --- Forwarded message: From pablo Thu May 27 18:42:11 1999 Subject: nonblocking lock? To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 18:42:11 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text Content-Length: 890 Is it possible to do a nonblocking lock? That is, I want several clients to execute, begin if table A is locked then go around doing stuff on other tables else lock A and do stuff on A that takes a long time endif the problem is, if I use normal lock, then after one client has locked and is doing stuff on A the other one will block and thus it won't be able to go around doing stuff on other tables. Is it possible to do a nonblocking lock that will just fail if the table is locked already? NOTE: I tried using PQrequestCancel but it won't cancel the request. It still blocks for as long as the lock lasts. The only way around I've found so far is to use PQreset. That's crude but works. But it leaves a dangling postmaster process that lives until the orignal lock is freed. Any other ideas? Thanks a lot Pablo Funes Brandeis University pablo@cs.brandeis.edu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: