Re: [GENERAL] IPv6
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] IPv6 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199905291335.JAA00941@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | IPv6 (Jon Dugan <jdugan@ncsa.uiuc.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
We have not had any requests for IPv6, so did not add it in 6.5. I have added it to the TODO list. > In the message from this list: > > http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-general/1998-10/msg00062.html > > Bruce mentions: > > The new INET/MAC type in 6.4 will not have IPv6 capability, but is planned > for 6.5. > > I've downloaded the latest snapshot of 6.5 (dated 05/28/1999), and it does > not appear to have the IPv6 stuff defined in > > pgsql/src/include/utils/network.c > > The teaser comments are all there, but no code. It doesn't look too > difficult to add (aside from deciding how to get a 128 bit wide C type). > I'd probably be willing to take a shot at it, but I wanted to see if anyone > else was working on it. [Of course, it may be much harder than it looks...] > > Will IPv6 make it into 6.5? > > We're moving our DNS management system from mSQL to Postgres (talk about > going from a Yugo to a Porsche!). During this transition we wanted to add > IPv6 support. We don't have any IPv6 in production yet, but we want our DNS > management system to be ready when the time comes. From what I gleaned from > the discussion on the various lists it sounds like if we use the cidr and > inet types we will be able to start using IPv6 addresses and networks when > the supprt is rolled in to Postgres. Is this true? Will it require a dump > and reload? Are there other issues to consider? I don't think it will require dump/reload, but the upgrade may. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: