Re: [HACKERS] DEFAULT fixed

> Now that we know the problem comes from missing atttypmod info, it
> seems likely that related failures can occur for NUMERIC and other
> types that depend on atttypmod.  (Are there any such types?  Even
> if there aren't now, there will probably be more and more in future.)
> It might be best to just bite the bullet and make the parser carry
> around both the type's OID and typmod at all times.

I will try to add it, but I must not that there are some cases where I
don't have access to the atttypmod of the result, so it may not be
possible to do it in every case.  Perhaps I should just leave this for
post 6.5, because we don't have any other bug reports on it.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026