Re: [HACKERS] sgmr* vs. md*
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] sgmr* vs. md* |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199905191631.MAA27780@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] sgmr* vs. md* (ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5 <Andreas.Zeugswetter@telecom.at>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > smgr is a generic i/o interface layer that allows multiple storage > > managers. Currently, we always use DEFAULT_SMGR as a parameter to smgr* > > functions, causing calls to the md* routines. Is there any value in > > just removing the smgr layer completely. It was originally for a CD > > jutebox i/o layer in addition to our current disk i/o layer. > > > Wouldn't this be the interface for a tablespace i/o manager ? > A tablespace has the advatage of only needing a number of files > for thousands of small tables, and reduces the overhead of many > open file handles. A tablespace is also needed before raw devices > can be efficiently exploited. Good point. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: