Re: sequences vs. transactions
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: sequences vs. transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199905120205.WAA01843@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | sequences vs. transactions (Vazsonyi Peter <neko@sp1.szif.hu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: sequences vs. transactions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Hi! > I found a bug, with $SUBJ - i mean ... so look at this: > t=> begin; > BEGIN > t=> select nextval('some_seq'); > nextval > ------- > 4 > (1 row) > t=> rollback; > ROLLBACK > t=> select nextval('some_seq'); > nextval > ------- > 5 <<<< five! and NOT 4 again, but 4 expected i think > (1 row) > > Or seqences are special case in transations? Sequence numbers are not re-used like normal transactions. The reason for this is that we would have to lock the sequence table for the entire duration of the transaction until it was committed if we wanted to do that. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: