Re: [HACKERS] Querytree printing

>     Who needs the pretty printed output of nodeDisplay() ?
> 
>     I  find  the  output  of nodeToString() much more useful when
>     debugging the rewrite  system  (especially  when  looking  at
>     querytree's  resulting  from joins with many RTE's, Resdom's,
>     TLE's plus qual, group by etc. clauses.  It's  hard  to  keep
>     track  where I am if the entire tree spans hundreds of lines.
> 
>     Thus I would like to change the output of -d4 back to that of
>     nodeToString().  Anyone against?

I like the long pretty printing, with the indentation.  You are
suggesting going to the more compressed format.  Can we have -d4 do
compressed printing, and -d5 to pretty printing?  That would be good.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026