Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 199905092010.QAA25661@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Is this fixed? > > What is the problem? I'll research a SPI patch. > > Check the hackers thread (last month I think) titled "libpq and SPI"; > the problem occurs when one submits a utility statement rather than > a plannable query via SPI. Apparently what is happening is that the > backend emits a 'T' message before it invokes the called statement > and then emits a 'D' message afterwards --- so if the called statement > causes a 'C' message to come out, libpq gets unhappy. This seems > to be clearly a violation of the FE/BE protocol to me, so I don't think > it's libpq's fault. > > Reasonable fixes might be to postpone the sending of 'T' till after > the invoked statement is executed, or to modify the traffic cop so > that a utility statement invoked from SPI doesn't send 'C'. > > I know a little bit about the parts of the backend that communicate with > the frontend, but nothing about SPI, so I'm not well prepared to solve > the problem by myself. > > regards, tom lane > > -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: