Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch

It is my assumption this has been applied to 6.5 beta, right?

[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> Hello all,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
> > [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org]On Behalf Of Hannu Krosing
> > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 1999 3:43 AM
> > To: Jan Wieck
> > Cc: hackers@postgreSQL.org
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch
> >
> 
> [snip]
>  
> > 
> > After that the reverse index scans, so that the index that are 
> > backwards can also be used for sorting.
> > BTW, can this be easily implemented/effective in PostgreSQL or are
> > our btree indexes optimised for forward scans ?
> >
> 
> PostgreSQL seems to have the ability to scan Index backward 
> because we can execute "fetch backward" command. 
> IMHO _bt_first() fucntion used to find first item in a scan should 
> be changed to work well in case of backward positioning.
> 
> I think this change also gives the partial solution for the problem 
> [ [HACKERS] Cursor Movement - Past the End ] reported by 
> David Hartwig. 
> 
> I have a sample code for this change.
> I can send it if someone want to check or test it.
>  
> Thanks.
> 
> Hiroshi Inoue
> Inoue@tpf.co.jp
> 
> 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026