Re: [HACKERS] Parser doesn't grok unqualified array element

> Has this come up before?  6.4.2 and current sources both have
> this problem:
> 
>     select count(*) from pg_proc where pg_proc.proargtypes[0] = 701;
> works, but
>     select count(*) from pg_proc where proargtypes[0] = 701;
> fails with ERROR: Unable to locate type name 'proargtypes' in catalog
> 
> The grammar doesn't seem to have a case that allows for a subscripted
> attribute name without a relation name in front of it.
> 
> It looks like fixing this might be as easy as making the "ColId"
> cases in a_expr, b_expr, possibly other places include an
> opt_indirection item like columnElem does.  But maybe there's
> more to it than meets the eye?

No, it is that easy.  For some reason, no one has done it yet.  Our TODO
list has:
* array index references without table name cause problems

I am sure the complexity of yacc grammar rules have kept some away from
fixing this. 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026