Re: [HACKERS] signal weirdness
От | Peter Galbavy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] signal weirdness |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19990329121712.A11678@office.knowledge.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | signal weirdness (Peter Galbavy <Peter.Galbavy@knowledge.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] signal weirdness
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 11:03:49AM +0100, Peter Galbavy wrote: > Oh, the result - the regression tests hang waiting for the postgres > process to receive the SIGQUIT to abort transaction that never > comes. My quick fix has been to replace the kill() with a direct call to siglongjmp() - not sure if this is safe, but it works. I am being a pragmatist today. I will try to get more debugging done on the signal problem at some stage, but I seem to have a "working" solution. Is their any reason not to replace the kill() with a longjmp() in the long run - no pun intended. Regards, -- Peter Galbavy Knowledge Matters Ltd http://www.knowledge.com /http://www.wonderland.org/ http://www.literature.org/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: