Re: [HACKERS] New regress test (was Re: Timespan_div misbehaving?)

> I found a dozen or so bogus tuples in several system tables (mostly
> pg_amop and pg_aggregate IIRC).  They had OID entries that referred
> to OIDs that actually exist ... but are in the wrong table.  For
> example some of the amopclaid fields had values that were OIDs of
> procs or types instead of opclass rows.  I believe these are leftovers
> from some ancient time when those OIDs were being used for something
> else.  (Most of the current assignments of those OIDs have to do with
> int8, so I know they are relatively new.  Evidently no one ran an
> oidjoins check while the OIDs were unused...)
> 
> All of the tuples in question were either unused or else referenced
> only by other bogus tuples, so I just deleted 'em.  (I'm new to
> adding/removing entries in system tables; is there anything else that
> needs to be done besides editing include/catalog/pg_*.h?)

Great.  Good job.  No, I just edit the *.h files, and run initdb.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026