Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199903241621.LAA09354@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> My guess is that either a struct field is being declared "long" when > it really oughta be "int", or some part of the tuple storage routines > is applying LONGALIGN() when it only oughta apply INTALIGN(). This > is something that would be difficult to track down or verify without > a box on which sizeof(int) != sizeof(long), so I haven't gone after it. > If you have time, please leave memutils.h with the more reasonable > looking definition of LONGALIGN() and go looking to find out which > system table has the sizing conflict. Yes. If you can tell us the column, by running initdb in debug mode (somehow), I think we can figure out the problem. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: