Re: portals vs. memory contexts
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: portals vs. memory contexts |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199903230427.XAA03271@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: portals vs. memory contexts (Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > I notice you used portals for vacuum, rather than a separate memory > > context. Can I ask why? > > Not me really -:) > /* > * Create a portal for safe memory across transctions. We need to > > Vacuum uses separate transaction for each of relations to be > vacuumed. VACPNAME is special portal name that is not cleaned > at commit/abort. > > > > > I am considering creating an expression portal or memory context to > > prevent the memory leaks from the utils/adt functions. > > Will you try to fix problems with WHERE a = lower(b) ? Yes, this will fix that too. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: