Re: [HACKERS] Backend problem with large objects

>On Thu, 4 Feb 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> Applied manually.  The patch did not apply cleanly, and needed a &tuple
>> in inv_wrold, not tuple.
>
>In the 4.6.2 release there are no &tuple arguments to inv_wrold around the
>patch. Perhaps there is a patch you have applied that I need? Please see
>below:

My patches are for 6.4.2. Bruce is talking about current.  Oh, I don't
know what version of PostgreSQL you are using.

>> > > On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> > > 
>> > Ok. I think I have found the source of the problem. Please apply
>> > included patches and try again.
>
>Many thanks indeed for this. Unfortunately it doesn't completely work:  it
>fixes the problem as reported, but when, instead of writing five
>characters, one at a time, I write five at once, the backend dies in
>the same place it did before. Here's the C code slightly modified to
>reproduce the problem:

Give me some time. I'm not sure if I could solve new problem, though.
--
Tatsuo Ishii