Re: [HACKERS] Re: BSDI 3.1 -> BSDI 4.0 performance degradation;(h
От | Tatsuo Ishii |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: BSDI 3.1 -> BSDI 4.0 performance degradation;(h |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199901200049.JAA24641@srapc451.sra.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BSDI 3.1 -> BSDI 4.0 performance degradation;(h (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: BSDI 3.1 -> BSDI 4.0 performance degradation;(h
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>> > I have seen gnu sed version 1.* beat bsd sed by 2-3x. >> >> Partly my fault, I fear. The regular-expression code used in BSD sed, >> last I checked, was the version I supplied for 4.4BSD... which works but >> was done in haste and is rather slow. A much improved new release (new >> implementation, in fact) is imminent, and the BSDI folk are likely to take >> advantage of it (they've prodded me about it from time to time). > >Cool. I think I have bugged you a few times too. > >I hate to see the GNU tools beat the BSD tools. > >PostgreSQL(www.postgresql.org) is ready to your replace your old regex >code with your new code as soon as you are ready. FYI, we have a >February 1 beta planned if you need testers. > >Hope you will announce something publically when it is ready. Please do not remove the old regex code in current source tree (ifdef'ed is ok) since I will not have enough time right now to make I18N version of the new regex code. -- Tatsuo Ishii
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: