Re: [HACKERS] Novice Question
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Novice Question |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 199901142256.RAA19577@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | RE: [HACKERS] Novice Question ("Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson@cpsgroup.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> OK, this is a complete novice question. > Do we or do we not have temp tables (and/or unnamed tables)? > If we don't why not? > I can see them making quite a few places of current development a lot > easier and flexible. I do realize TANSTAAFL, but as I grok it could be > used for multiple tuple return from functions, the > deferrable-constraints problems, implementing the SQL92 join syntax, and > subselects in from clauses and select lists. It is on the TODO list, and is not a hard job at all. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: