Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC ResultSetMetaData.getColumnType and getColumnTypeName work properly?
От | Shankha S. Mitra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC ResultSetMetaData.getColumnType and getColumnTypeName work properly? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199812281651.IAA20929@ssm-office.antrim.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC ResultSetMetaData.getColumnType and getColumnTypeName work properly? (Peter T Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC ResultSetMetaData.getColumnType and
getColumnTypeName work properly?
Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC ResultSetMetaData.getColumnType and getColumnTypeName work properly? |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
Aah, that explains it. I'm using JDK 1.2 beta4 (which I guess _is_ now JDK 2.0). THe JDBC in JDK 2.0 does have ARRAY, etc. Thanks for the reply. Shankha Peter T. Mount writes: > Yes, there is no constant of Types.ARRAY in JDBC (see below). The > implementation sets the type to OTHER if it doesn't recognise it. > > > Also getColumnTypeName() returns _int4; is that correct? > > no, it should return String - will check. > > > Shankha Mitra > > > > > > As an aside, I decided to print out the values of all the JDBC types and > > I get: > > ARRAY=2003 > > In JDBC2 2003 equates to the new value Types.REF (atleast in my copy of > the documentation), and there is no ARRAY type. > > What JDK are you using? Looking at these values, 2000 and higher are > introduced in 1.2 so they will not yet be supported. > > Currently JDK2 (formerly 1.20 is not supported. I'm about to start work on > this today - having to revert to Win95 to do it though :-( ) > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Shankha S. Mitra shankha@antrim.com Principal Software Engineer ph: (+1) 831.430.4814 Antrim Design Systems fax: (+1) 831.430.1904 Scotts Valley, CA -------------------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: