Re: [HACKERS] Does this make sense:
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Does this make sense: |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199812141455.JAA21406@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Does this make sense: (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Does this make sense:
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > char * > crypt_getpwdfilename() > { > > static char *pfnam = NULL; > > if (!pfnam) > { > int bufsize; > bufsize = strlen(DataDir) + strlen(CRYPT_PWD_FILE) + 2; > pfnam = (char *) palloc(bufsize); > spprintf(pfnam, bufsize, "%s/%s", DataDir, CRYPT_PWD_FILE); > } > > return pfnam; > } > > Why the check for '!ipfnam'? Seems useless since we are setting it to > NULL the line before...no? Actually, no. We are declaring it as static, so the first time the function is called, it is set to NULL. After that, it is not initialized for each function call because a static local variable's value is kept between function calls. It is like a global variable in its duration, but in local scope. This is an old trick to run the initialization code only the first time the function is called. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: