Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199810301603.LAA09070@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here
Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > > On Sun, 30 Aug 1998, Tom Lane wrote: > >> So I think I have to vote in favor of leaving the socket where it is. > > > Let me put my vote in...: $PGSQLHOME/run/{pgsql.pid,pgsql.pid.socket} > > Screw backwards compatibility...v6.5 becomes v7.0 *shrug* > > Catching up on back email, Marc? > > I think the end consensus of that thread was that we should move the > socket file to someplace safer than /tmp (exactly where being a > configure-time choice), *and* optionally put a softlink to it in /tmp > for backwards compatibility with old clients. Use of the /tmp link > would be deprecated because of possible security risks, but it could > continue to work for as long as a particular installation needed to > keep that option enabled. Just a reminder that if you move it, all clients must know the new location, or somehow the location must be accessable by the clients. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: