NS32K regression test
От | Jon Buller |
---|---|
Тема | NS32K regression test |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199810292030.OAA25184@bullbox.heeia.hi.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] NS32K regression test
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I did a CVS update tuesday night, built it yesterday, and ran the regression test today... Here are the results of running "grep failed" on regress.out: destroydb: database destroy failed on regression. float8 .. failed It appears that there is some confusion whether 1e200 is an overflow or underflow here. Something to check in libcis my guess. I also got errors with 10e-400 and -10e-400 underflowing. datetime .. failed Here I get my same old problem of: (There are others, but I suspect they all have the same root cause.) QUERY:SELECT ('now'::datetime - 'current'::datetime) AS "ZeroSecs"; ! ZeroSecs ! ----------------------------- ! @ 428 days 7 hours 8 secs ago horology .. failed I suspect the same stuff that makes datetime fail is making this fail too... inet .. failed This seems to be caused by: + ERROR: type name lookup of cidr failed I did a gmake distclean, configure,gmake, gmake install, initdb, cd test/regress, gmake all, gmake runtest. Did I miss something? Is the betadifferent from the CVS version I got (Tuesday night)? sanity_check .. failed This one looks pretty serious, but perhaps it's not: QUERY: VACUUM; ! pqReadData() -- backend closed the channelunexpectedly. ! This probably means the backend terminated abnormally before or while processing the request. ! We have lost the connection to the backend, so further processing is impossible. Terminating. misc .. failed The results of this query are reversed: QUERY: SELECT unique1 FROM onek2 WHERE unique1 < 2; And inet_tbl is missing from another query. (Only looking at the 3 line diff context doesn't tell me much, but I suspect that it's the same error that caused the inet tests to fail.) There you have it, NetBSD-current/pc532 (from about a month ago) with Tuesday night's CVS update of PostgreSQL is not quite ready for prime time. It's pretty close though. If someone wants to log into my machine and take a whack at it, I'll try to set something up. Otherwise, I'll have to wait a week or two before I can touch it. I don't think I have the ability to submit any diffs this late in the beta cycle safely anyway. Besides I have a big part of a homework assignment to do before Monday, and the prof scheduled a midterm the same day he wants to collect the homework. 8-( (Too bad I can't quit my job for a year and finish this degree work all at once.) Jon Buller
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: