Re: [HACKERS] Sigh, build is broken again

> Someone checked in code that assumes vsnprintf() exists.
> 
> Should be cool, we have an emulation right?  Well, no.
> configure sets up to build port/snprintf.c if snprintf()
> doesn't exist.  HPUX, for one, has that but not vsnprintf.
> 
> I guess the right fix is for configure to check for *both*
> snprintf and vsnprintf --- anyone see a problem with that?

Oops, that was me, today.  Patch attached.  This is not the time to be
adding new portability calls.

Comments on how to handle this?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026