Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199810200421.AAA29108@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind (darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Thus spake Bruce Momjian > > If you define a fuction that can take inet or cidr type, I recommend you > > define a typedef called something like "inet_or_cidr" that is the same > > as inet, and use that in functions that can take either type. > > Perhaps. We can look at that 6.4++. For now there will be redundancy. > Afterwards we'll look at how to fold them. I hope you realize that that 6.4++ would have to be 6.5. We typically don't to system table changes as part of minor releases, unless there is a really good reason. It is hard to do for us and for the users. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: