Re: [HACKERS] Re: order by and index path
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: order by and index path |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199810151612.MAA15304@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: order by and index path ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > We do not have this statistical information. So the whole > > thing is at this time academic. > > I recall that Commercial Ingres made the assumption that one row (or 1% > of rows? My memory of Ingres is fading :) would be returned from a > qualified query if no statistics were available to suggest otherwise. > > It did collect statistics on data distribution to try to help make those > optimizer choices. > > It may be reasonable to assume that if there is an index, then using it > with any qualified query would be a win. Since the alternative is to > decide to _not_ use an index, a decision for which we have no support > with existing statistics. For =, the assumion is 1 row, for > the assumption is 1/3 of the table. With pg_statistic, it uses that. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: