Re: [GENERAL] Long update query ?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Long update query ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199810012254.SAA18974@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? ("Taral" <taral@mail.utexas.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] > > This is caused by a semi-well known weakness in the optimizer. > > The optimizer > > rewrites the WHERE clause in conjunctive normal form (CNF): > > > > (A and B) or (C and D) ==> (A or C) and (A or D) and (B or C) > > and (B or D) > > > > Wouldn't disjunctive normal form be better, since it can be implemented as > the simple union of a set of small queries? Please tell us more. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: