Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers]

> > I would be glad to help with integrating it.  We need a decision,
> > people.  Who do we want to do this, and how are we going to handle
> > integrating this into the beta, if we want to?
> >
> > BTW, does pg_upgrade work for people.  That may be a quick fix for the
> > beta people to get these new system types WITHOUT dump/reload.
>
> Better yet, they _should_ use pg_upgrade, so it gets some beta testing
> too :)
>
> I can help with making the types built-in, once there is code ready.
> However, until we finish tracking down the indexing problems I'd like to
> stay away from unrelated changes to the catalogs and backend code to
> avoid confusing the issue.
>
> Now that I think about it, that would have probably included the
> snprintf changes, since now people trying to do debugging may not be
> able to build with a new tree until that gets integrated...

Yes, we are definately on hold until the indexing this is fixed.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)