Re: [HACKERS] Fix for initdb/indexing problems
От | Keith Parks |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Fix for initdb/indexing problems |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199809030925.KAA18833@mtcc.demon.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Fix for initdb/indexing problems
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce, Just to confirm, your fixes are just the job. The regression tests run fine with only the failures I have always seen due to maths precision and SIGFPE handling. Thanks for your persistence in tracking this "bug" down. Keith. Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> > > OK, I have found the problem. I looked AGAIN at CatalogIndexInsert(), > because all problems seem to be localized there. I remembered something > Tom Szybist said yesterday while we were on the phone about Datum only > being one value. > > I said they are chained together, which I saw in IndexFormDatum, but > when I looked, I saw that the Datum pointer indexed in IndexFormDatum > was only a single Datum value, not an array of datum values like nulls > is defined. > > With single-key system indexes, this was not a problem, but with the new > multi-key system indicies, it is. > > I have attached the patch, and it is applied to the tree. Please let me > know if this fixes the many reported index problems. It should. >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: