Re: Rules and views (was Re: [HACKERS] Rules: 2nd patch)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rules and views (was Re: [HACKERS] Rules: 2nd patch) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199808191756.NAA04184@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Rules and views (was Re: [HACKERS] Rules: 2nd patch) (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)) |
Ответы |
Re: Rules and views (was Re: [HACKERS] Rules: 2nd patch)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> If nobody votes against, I would like to make them builtins > as pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() and then setup the > appropriate views (pg_rule and pg_view) in template1 by > initdb like we do it with pg_user. It cannot break anything, > except that a rule action the two functions cannot handle > will make the new views unusable. But it would be a really > powerful possibility for pg_dump or just useful to see what > that damn event qual and parsetree's in pg_rewrite came from. > > Comments? > Go, Jan, go. -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: