Re: AW: [HACKERS] Large objects names
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Large objects names |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199808061543.LAA07868@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | AW: [HACKERS] Large objects names (Andreas Zeugswetter <andreas.zeugswetter@telecom.at>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > >Currently, large objects are stored internally as xinv### and xinx###. > > > >I would like to rename this for 6.4 to be _lobject_### to prevent > >namespace collisions, and make them clearer for administrators. > > > >However, this may cause problems for backward compatability for large > >object users. As I see there are going to be other new large object > >things in 6.4, it may not be an issue. > > > >Is is OK to rename them internally? > > How about giving them their own subdirectory large_object/_lob_###, > then there would be no naming conflict ? > Since all others call them LOB I would use _lob_### instead. That would be interesting. -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: